Also He has put eternity in their hearts, except that no one can find out the work that God does from beginning to end Ecclesiastes 3: Is God omnipotent, omnipresent and omniscient. If God were stinted in might and had a limit to His strength we might well despair.
Pure nonsense has no meaning whatever, such as any nonsense word that does not include sensible words sgfdpfkp.
This perception is limited to our senses. Moreover, if, because b and c are not repeatable, an omnipotent agent is not required to bring about b or cthen for the same reason, that agent is also not required to be able to bring about impossible or necessary states of affairs.
Although not everyone agrees that La Croix's response is satisfactory, it is widely held that the prospects are not good for a consistent general definition or analysis of omnipotence in terms of acts Ross Notice a couple of comments from two books: Some have suggested that omnipotence is an incoherent concept.
The most popular works espousing this point are from Harold Kushner in Judaism. On the other hand, there being a stone its creator cannot lift is a possible state of affairs, and could be brought about by an omnipotent being, under the Leibniz-Ross theory, for an omnipotent being could bring it about that some other being created a stone which that being could not lift.
We have an omnipotent Is an omnipotent god a coherent. Vesuvius's erupting prior to by, at that time, bringing about Mt.
Unfortunately concerning a multiverse there is a lack of empirical correlation. Afteran omnipotent being could still bring about the latter state of affairs, though not the former.
This is, perhaps, the easiest of the three to answer: Here is a definition which cpatures the basic idea of these Medieval analyses: His Spirit searches all things 1 Corinthians 2: Omnipotence and Unrestricted Repeatability One attempt to analyze omnipotence in terms of unrestricted repeatability is the account of Hoffman and Rosenkrantz.
The Bible reveals that the eternal power of the Godhead should be obvious: If it is unsuccessful, then this is a task which this God is not capable of, and thus the God cannot be truly omnipotent. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 71 1: This is similar to the Medieval suggestion since, according to classical theology, God is necessarily without defect or infirmity, so that, if the action A requires a defect or infirmity, 2 does not require that God, in order to count as omnipotent, should be able to do it.
Nor is it possible for an agent to bring about a necessary state of affairs e.
Without analyses of these notions, it is hard to tell whether Wielenberg's analysis is self-consistent and whether it is consistent with other traditional divine attributes. Note that if, because a is not possibly brought about by someone, an omnipotent agent is not required to be able to bring about athen for the same reason, that agent is also not required to be able to bring about impossible or necessary states of affairs.
At first glance, this appears possible, but there is the following argument for the opposite view. Thus, it appears that if God exists, then an omnipotent agent who is morally imperfect is impossible.
Jesusthe creator and eternal Son of God, who lived a sinless life, loves us so much that He died for our sins, taking the punishment that we deserve, was buriedand rose from the dead according to the Bible.
Hartshorne proceeded within the context of the theological system known as process theology. Humans are limited in their capacity to conceptualize God, and thus are incapable of accurately judging the relationship between evil and a divine being.
Thus, just like no one can go to one end or the other of the universe, no one can get to the beginning or the end of the Godhead. Defenders of the compatibility of omnipotence and necessary moral perfection must deny at least one of the premises of the argument, and, indeed, each of them has been denied.
Result Theories The main alternatives to act theories of omnipotence are result theories, theories which analyze omnipotence in terms of the results an omnipotent being would be able to bring about.
It only follows that if the being were to create the stone, then there would be something it could not do. But it might be replied that an agent such as McEar is impossible. But if we are to use the word omniscient to describe our Father and His glorified Son, it cannot mean that God knows our every choice before we make it in every circumstance, because Scripture tells us otherwise.
The immediate coherence of the concept of omnipotence is how we even can get the sense that omnipotence is paradoxical: But there could not be two coexistent omnipotent agents.
This is not a limitation or incoherene in God's omnipotence, because 1+1=3 and a rock too heavy for an omnipotent being to lift are not things. In other words, it is the propositions themselves that are incoherent, not God's omnipotence.
God cannot do anything that is not consistent with his nature, this can hardly equate to omnipotence since omnipotence should be infinite, not limited as a result of a nature.
god has power to do everything logically consistent with his nature. God is Omnipotent in Understanding Psalm – “Great is our Lord and mighty in power; his understanding has no limit.” Psalm – “The LORD does whatever pleases him, in the heavens and on the earth, in the seas and all their depths.”.
Omnipotence is maximal power. Maximal greatness (or perfection) includes omnipotence. According to traditional Western theism, God is maximally great (or perfect), and therefore is omnipotent. Omnipotence seems puzzling, even paradoxical, to many philosophers.
If God were omnipotent, omniscient, and omnibenevolent, then evil would not exist. The concept of the God of Classical Theism is incoherent because within the attributes of God contradict each other and they also contradict our experience of the universe.
If the concept of God is otherwise coherent, then this claim is probably true. Argues that God's omnipotence consists in his ability to actualize any possible world, but God is impelled by a'moral necessity' to choose the best.
Chapter 9 argues that there are possible worlds which God, though omnipotent, cannot actualize. Rosenkrantz.Is an omnipotent god a coherent